Evolving Practices for Northern Sweden’s Boreal and Industrial Landscapes
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2025.1.07Keywords:
Ancestral knowledges, architecture, boreal forests, decolonization, environmental art, forest urbanism, green transition, landscape, Sápmi, self-sufficiencyAbstract
By contrasting three ongoing research projects along with complementary arguments, this paper explores mediating practices from environmental art and architecture perspectives in the context of industrial forestry and Sweden’s ‘green transition’. The general discourse on ‘green transitions’ significantly amplifies the cultural and economic values of forests within and beyond Sweden. This amplification turns forests into reflexive entities that compel broader value revisions, challenging the extractivist character of modern urbanism. An example is the recent public debate in Sweden about what distinguishes a ‘forest’ (skog) from a ‘plantation’ (plantage). The debate does not reinforce the binary divide between the terms. Instead, it is prompting renewed, if overdue, attention to suppressed Indigenous and rural ancestries, as well as to alternative narratives and techniques that rethink industrial forestry tropes. From that context, our arguments position our respective research works—regarding 1) tree nurseries and climate injustice, 2) the transnational timber industry, and 3) new resource economies for the built environment—in ways which form and encourage research intersections that recognize ancestral, physical, and temporal scales as a potential for enriching the model that is the Swedish ‘green transition’.
How to Cite
Published
References
Adamson, J., & Galeano, J. C. (2016). ‘Why Bears, Yakumama (Mother of All Waters), and Other Transformational Beings Are (Still) Good to Think’. In Humanities for the Environment: Ecocentrism and Indigenous Studies (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
Ahlström, A., et al. (2022). Widespread unquantified conversion of old boreal forests to plantations. Earth‘s Future, 10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003221
Arnborg, T. (1990). Forest types of northern Sweden. Vegetatio, 90(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045585
Berríos-Negrón, L. (2023). ‘The Golden Spike Is Not the Nuclear Bomb’. In Greenhouse Stories: A Critical Re-examination of Transparent Microcosms (pp. 1–20). Onomatopee.
---. (2020). Breathtaking Greenhouse Parastructures. Doctoral dissertation, KTH/Konstfack.
Björklund, S. (2024). Miljardförluster för vindkraften – “I princip obefintlig lönsamhet”. Dagens Nyheter. Retrieved from https://www.dn.se
Booth, M. S., et al. (2020). It’s time to stop pretending burning forest biomass is carbon neutral. GCB Bioenergy, 12(12), 1036–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12716
Cadena, M., & Blaser, M. (2018). A World of Many Worlds. Duke University Press.
Dagens Nyheter. (2021). Insändare: “Kalla naturskog för skog och virkesåkrar för plantage”. Retrieved from https://www.dn.se
Demos, T. J. (2017). Against the Anthropocene: Visual Culture and Environment Today. Sternberg Press.
Diamond, J. (2011). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Penguin.
European Commission. (2023). European Green Deal: EU agrees stronger legislation to accelerate the rollout of renewable energy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
Fredriksson, A., & Warne, B. (1993). Akacians villkor: Att bygga och bo i samklang med natur. Warne Förlag.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
Helms, J. (Ed.). (1998). The Dictionary of Forestry. Society of American Foresters.
Holm, S.-O. (2015). A Management Strategy for Multiple Ecosystem Services in Boreal Forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34(4), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1009633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1009633
International Energy Agency. (n.d.). Why are buildings so important? Retrieved from https://www.iea.org
International Rights of Nature Tribunal. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.rightsofnaturetribunal.org
Isbell, F., et al. (2015). Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature, 526(7574), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15374
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
Kokins, T., & Brown, J. (2023). Sweden’s Timber Empire. In Intersections Research Conference: MATERIAL ECONOMIES. Amherst, MA.
Kokins, T. (2024). Visual narrative “Contested landscapes”. In Eight Degrees / Contemporary Art on the Forest. Bildmuseet, Umeå.
Kokins, T., et al. (2024). Umeå School of Architecture group installation “The Waterfall That Went Silent”. In Luleå Art Biennial 2024. Luleå.
Kolbert, E. (2021). Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future. Crown.
La Cour, E. (2022). Geo-Aesthetical Discontent: Svalbard, the Guide, and Post-Future Essayism. Doctoral dissertation, ArtMonitor.
Made You Look. (2022). Gardens of Others [Podcast]. Retrieved from http://www.made-you-look.net
Malm, A. (2022). The Future Is the Termination Shock: On the Antinomies and Psychopathologies of Geoengineering. Historical Materialism, 30(4), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-20222369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-20222369
Mo, L., et al. (2023). Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z
More of Everything. (2021). Protect the Forest, Sweden & Greenpeace Nordic. Retrieved from https://moreofeverything.org
Moriggi, A., et al. (2020). A Care-Based Approach to Transformative Change: Ethically-Informed Practices, Relational Response-Ability & Emotional Awareness. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 23(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186
Morton, T. (2018). Being Ecological. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11638.001.0001
Mueller, A. (2023). Norrsken - Drömmen om den gröna industrin. Ord&visor Förlag.
Niranjan, A. (2023). European Union strikes landmark deal on law to restore and protect nature. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com
Norstedt, G., Axelsson, A.-L., & Östlund, L. (2014). Exploring Pre-Colonial Resource Control of Individual Sami Households. Arctic, 67(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4389
Petti, A., & Richards, M. L. (2021). What Does It Mean “To Decolonize”? Decolonizing Architecture Advanced Studies. Royal Institute of Art, Sweden.
Polvi, L. E., et al. (2020). Facets and scales in river restoration: Interdependence of hydrological, geomorphic, ecological, and biogeochemical processes at different spatial scales. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110288
Ramage, M. H., et al. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107
Ramos Caceres, C. (2024). Applying Industrial Ecology in Urban Planning for the Local Integration of Data Centers. Doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology.
Rantanen, M., et al. (2022). The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment, 3, 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
Redeker, C., Thor, S., & Hirt, C. (2022). From being consumers to becoming producers: Designing Cycles at 64°. UOU Journal, 4, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.14198/UOU.2022.4.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/UOU.2022.4.10
Röstlund, L. (2022). Skoglandet – En granskning. Bokförlaget Forum.
Sandström, P. (2016). On the decline of ground lichen forests in the Swedish boreal landscape: Implications for reindeer husbandry and sustainable forest management. Ambio, 45(4), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0759-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0759-0
Santos, B. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge.
Shannon, K., Cavalieri, C., & Konijnendijk, C. (2023). Urban forests, forest urbanisms, and global warming: Developing greener, cooler, and more resilient and adaptable cities. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 18(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258720
Sköld, P., Sandström, M., & Bolaane, M. (Eds.). (2015). Under the Same Sun: Parallel Issues and Mutual Challenges for San and Sámi Peoples and Research. Vaartoe/Centre for Sami Research, Umeå University.
Skytt, T., et al. (2021). Climate mitigation forestry—Temporal trade-offs. Environmental Research Letters, 16(11), 114037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30fa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30fa
Steffen, W., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Stengers, I. (2018). The Challenge of Ontological Politics. In A World of Many Worlds (pp. 1–20). Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478004318-004
Svensson, J., et al. (2019). Landscape trajectory of natural boreal forest loss as an impediment to green infrastructure. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13148
Sveaskog. (n.d.). Sweden’s largest forest owner. Retrieved from https://www.sveaskog.se
Svenska Dagbladet. (2018). Skogsdebatten: “Sveriges skog kan inte jämföras med plantager”. Retrieved from https://www.svd.se
Swedish Forest Agency. (2023). Fellings. Retrieved from https://www.skogsstyrelsen.se
The Sami Parliament. (2022). Truth Commission in Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.sametinget.se
Tunón, H., et al. (2016). Ethical codes of conduct for research related to Indigenous peoples and local communities—Core principles, challenges, and opportunities. In Ethics in Indigenous Research: Past Experiences, Future Challenges (pp. 1–20). Vaartoe/Centre for Sami Research, Umeå University.
Umeå Kommun. (2022). Marknadsplats för byggåterbruk. Retrieved from https://www.umea.se
Viesturs, J., Auzins, A., & Snore, I. (2018). Indications of gentle forest land grabbing in Latvia. In Rural Development and Entrepreneurship Production and Co-Operation in Agriculture (pp. 359–367). Latvia University of Agriculture. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.042
Vince, J. (2006). Maori Consultation Under the Resource Management Act and the 2005 Amendments. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law. Retrieved from http://www.nzlii.org
Westberg, M. (2021). Forests are not renewable; the feeling of Sweden‘s ancient trees. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com
Yang, C. (2022). The nexus of Swedish food consumption emissions in climate, health, and fairness. Swedish Environmental Institute. Retrieved from https://www.sei.org
